Canada's best medical care for women
These five female-focused hospitals are leading the way in medical care for women
By John Lorinc
More and more, researchers and medical practitioners here and abroad are recognizing the need for a “gender lens” in delivering health care, because the way a medical condition affects women is often different from the way it affects men. But some Canadian institutions have been delivering female-focused care for years, and are setting a good example for our healthcare system nationwide. We zeroed in on four such women’s healthcare facilities, and one that will open in 2009.
Women’s College Hospital, Toronto
History: Traces its origins to the 1880s, when Women’s Medical College was established in response to the refusal of medical schools in Toronto to admit female med students. The name was officially changed to Women’s College Hospital in 1924, and in 1935 the hospital moved to its present location, a 10-storey, 140-bed facility. Staff members have pioneered numerous improvements in women’s health, including the use of the Pap test and the opening of the first cancer detection clinic in Ontario. Women’s College was the first hospital in Ontario to use mammography and the first in Canada to have a perinatal intensive care unit.
How they help: Covered by provincial health insurance and available on a self-referral basis, the Women Recovering from Abuse Program (WRAP) at Women’s College Hospital is the only childhood abuse program for adult victims of child abuse in Canada. It’s also uniquely situated inside a large urban hospital, and Eva-Marie Stern, a psychotherapist and art therapist who helped start the program, says the connection dovetails well with WCH’s philosophy of women’s health. “At Women’s College, we believe mental health affects physical health,” she explains, noting that conditions such as fibromyalgia have been linked to childhood maltreatment. Indeed, many of the women who have gone through the WRAP counselling sessions were referred by physicians at WCH’s Family Practice Health Centre.
For four half-days a week over a span of two months, a group of eight women gathers with WRAP’s team of professional facilitators to begin the hard work of repairing the many effects of childhood trauma, including their capacity to forge relationships. The facilitators help the women to explore their experience, express themselves candidly and take risks in relating to the others.
Stern notes that part of the process involves art therapy, which allows survivors to express feelings they can’t articulate in words, sometimes because their abusers had threatened revenge if they ever spoke about their experiences.
In the 10 years of its existence, about 350 women have gone through the program, and there’s always a waiting list, says Stern. She adds that a qualitative assessment of the program showed that graduates reported better relationships, a greater sense of security and improved self-esteem.
Women’s Health Clinic, Winnipeg
History: Opened in downtown Winnipeg in 1981, and remains the only women’s health clinic in Canada with a community board. Funded by the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority and the United Way. With physicians, nurse practitioners, mental health counsellors, a dietitian, midwives and several volunteer programs, the clinic serves women of all ages and backgrounds with reproductive health needs, mental health issues or complex women’s health concerns.
How they help: When a “client” books an appointment at the Women’s Health Clinic, she can always expect to spend a comfortable 20 to 40 minutes with one of the facility’s healthcare practitioners. “We try to address all of her health issues during her visit,” says medical director and family physician Dr. Carol Scurfield.
The clinic was founded by a group of women in the community who felt that women weren’t being well served by the mainstream healthcare system. Accountable to a community board, it has adhered to a philosophy of care that is both holistic and realistic. As Scurfield points out, health concerns are actually inextricably connected to the individual’s lifestyle and socio-economic circumstances. The clinic’s practitioners feel that in order to offer meaningful and collaborative advice, they need to know what else is going on in their clients’ lives. The basic belief, she says, “is that women are experts on their own bodies.”
The clinic has steadily expanded its services and now offers consultations and outreach programs on unplanned pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections, birth control, mental health, menopause, adolescent health issues, mothering issues, services for immigrant women and political advocacy on public health policy.
The clinic also believes in the importance of promoting population health and a gender analysis of health care and public policy. That involves community education and the operation of several volunteer programs with preventive health practices for women and children.
BC Women’s Hospital & Health Centre, Vancouver
History: Founded by The Salvation Army in 1927 as the Grace Hospital. The only facility in British Columbia that is devoted primarily to the health of women, newborns and families. With 7,500 deliveries annually, BC Women’s is Canada’s busiest maternity centre. It also provides provincial leadership in developing, maintaining and participating in effective networks of partners who share the goal of better health for women and their families. As an academic health centre, BC Women’s is affiliated with the University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University and Women’s Health Research Institute.
How they help: In 2005, hospital obstetricians began scrutinizing delivery data and discovered that the province had a noticeably higher rate of C-section births than the rest of the country. They concluded that geography played a role: In remote communities it was often easier to transfer an expectant mother to a larger centre and perform a scheduled C-section, explains obstetrician/gynecologist Dr. Jan Christilaw, vice-president of medical affairs at BC Women’s. But the goal now is to find ways to allow women to deliver in their own communities, where they are close to family and support networks.
Given its mandate, BC Women’s has launched several outreach initiatives in the past decade to reduce the provincial C-section rate. These include Friday morning telehealth “rounds,” during which physicians from anywhere in the province can tune in to live two-way videoconferences by BC Women’s specialists. The hospital’s obstetricians have taken advantage of virtual communications to train dozens of small-town GPs to perform certain types of general procedures, such as C-sections. And physicians in remote communities can upload ultrasounds to the Internet for
a consult if they spot something troubling.
IWK Health Centre, Halifax
History: Formed in 1996 with the merger of Halifax’s Grace Maternity Hospital and the Izaak Walton Killam Hospital for Children (though its history dates back 100 years). Has the greatest number of births among maternity wards in Atlantic Canada. Specializes in health care for women, children, youth and families. IWK includes many outpatient clinics both on- and off-site.
How they help: About three years ago, Dr. Scott Farrell, an IWK uro-gynecologist, decided to launch a clinical trial to follow up a hunch he had about the way women seek treatment for urinary incontinence, a problem he says affects one in three women age 30 to 65.
Farrell had observed that many physicians in his field tended to offer women surgery rather than “conservative” options, such as exercises and the use of a pessary—a device made of medical-grade rubber that is placed in the vagina to stop bladder leakage.
His team of three uro-gynecologists and four nurses compared patients who had referred themselves to a clinic staffed by a continence educator and nurses with patients who had been seen by gynecologists. The former group tended to receive the more conservative treatment options. The trial confirmed Farrell’s expectations: that such non-invasive approaches produce results that are as good as surgery—and sometimes better. That’s partly because the continence educator was able to spend the amount of time needed to better educate patients on how to deal with this benign but stressful condition.
In 2005, led by nurse continence advisor Linda Irving, a self-referral continence clinic at the IWK was established. It’s the first of its kind in Atlantic Canada.
Incontinence becomes more common in older age groups. Farrell predicts more strain on healthcare resources as well as gynecologists as baby boomers grow older.
At the same time, it is also a frequently untreated condition. Farrell notes that between 50 and 80 percent of sufferers don’t seek medical help, sometimes because they’re intimidated by physicians or feel ashamed. In addition to the self-referral clinic, which focuses on long-term management and education rather than on surgical intervention, Farrell recently set up a company that developed an over-the-counter self-inserted pessary, known as Uresta, which is available in Atlantic Canada and will be distributed this year to drugstores across Canada.
Lois Hole Hospital for Women, Edmonton
The plan: A six-storey, 160-bed facility being built on the Royal Alexandra Hospital campus, and part of Alberta Health Services. Construction began in 2005; expected to open in 2009. Will focus on high-risk births, specialized clinics and in-patient gynecology, telehealth services to patients in distant communities, women’s health research and training of professionals in women’s health. Mandate to serve patients throughout Alberta and northern Canada.
How they will help: “Down to earth and so sincere.” That’s how Joanna Pawlyshyn, vice-president of Edmonton’s Royal Alexandra Hospital, describes the much-beloved former Alberta lieutenant-governor Lois Hole, whose name will adorn Edmonton’s newest hospital-within-a-hospital. The trick, she adds, was building a facility that embodies what Hole meant to Albertans.
When Pawlyshyn and her development team began cobbling together a vision, they decided to embrace the obvious elements—such as state-of-the-art operating room technology—as well as design details that will distinguish Lois Hole Hospital for Women as a hospital designed with women in mind.
Instead of treating women’s conditions such as pregnancy as illnesses, the hospital opted for a “wellness” model for the birthing rooms, so spouses, children and families could be accommodated. The designers consciously opted for a spa-like ambience, with soothing colours and finishes, natural light-filled common areas and lots of art instead of the clutter of signs that typifies most hospital corridors. The in-patient rooms, two-thirds of which will be private, are set up to have the look and feel of hotel suites, complete with makeup mirrors, adjustable shower heads and high-end fixtures.
Those décor details complement a layout that is tailored to the hospital’s proposed specialties, including high-risk multiple births. Two operating rooms just for C-sections will be situated across the hall from the labour delivery rooms. All rooms are on the same floor as the neonatal care unit, to reduce transfer time and delays.
This article was originally titled "Leading the Way for Canadian Women," in the May 2009 issue of Best Health. Subscribe today to get the full Best Health experience—and never miss an issue!—and make sure to check out what's new in the latest issue of Best Health.
Best Health Magazine, May 2009




















































I urgently need treatment for rectocele and vaginal prolapse as well as cystocele. Your site did not help me locate a facility that deals with these problems in Ontario. What can I do to find care I can get within OHIP?
See it really is a womans world.
Men need to demand that the Canadian government hears our voices. To that end, start yelling, a lot!
Stand up for your rights, your sons rights and the rights of all men!
Julia- Why don't you check your misandric bigotry at the door. It's well documented that men are second class citizens when it comes to health care in Canada. They have less access to family physicians, they die earlier than women across all ages, have poorer medical outcomes in all of the major chronic illnesses except Alzheimer's and are disadvantaged in both the diagnosis and provision of gender specific medical services. And the " feminization " of medicine has resulted in our medical system morphing into one that provides services for women by women. While women get brand new gender specific hospitals provided by governments, men cannot even get basic cancer tests, like PSA blood screening, underwritten. And as for your attempt at a history lesson, men were almost exclusively the subjects in medical research because researchers were fearful that the hazards of clinical trials would damage the reproductive systems of women of child bearing age. There was no sinister male plot to exclude women. They were also motivated by a concern for the health of any child conceived during the course of those trials and a later proven faulty assumption that gender was not relevant to human health. And it's not just men who suffer because of the female monopolization of the lion's share of health care resources. Aboriginals, the aged and disabled are also disadvantaged. But that's what you get when you allocate those resources on the basis of gender and on who shouts the loudest rather than need.
That is the point, Julia, that the gender lens does exist, but is only focused on one gender.
If "diseases and conditions manifest themselves differently in genders" why does only one gender have hospitals and research devoted to exploring these manifestations only in that gender. It is more likely that the second part of your posting is from where your hostility originates.
@ Julia, why should the men today pay for historic indiscretions? And why are there no male specific hospitals? Society does pander to women’s issues Julia. It’s disgusting. These hospitals should be, and will be, scrutinized by the male population. There will be no quality until women respect men.
There's a male movement in the process Julia, it WILL restore the rights of men. You and your like should get out of the way.
Perhaps women should pay more in taxes if they are to receive special health care. Why should my tax dollar pay for gender based health care I can never benefit from?
Dr. McInnis - did you fail to read the line about how things affect men and women differently? While you point out that gynecology and obstetrics are the primary medical care areas that differ for women, (and I get the feeling that this is where you think where the focus on women's health should start and end), I must counter that you also need to take into consideration that diseases and conditions manifest themselves differently in the genders. This is very reason that this gender lens exists; treatments for women need to be focused upon across ALL spectrums, not just gynecology and obstetrics, as you so narrow-mindedly pointed out.
True, universal care is important, but surely it can't be recommended that one-size-fits-all treatments be offered. That would be irresponsible and detrimental. And, while you think that men have become "second class patients" (which is untrue) to the so-called pandering to women and children's issues - must you be reminded that for a very long time, Medicine was only concerned with male needs while everyone else was left behind? I highly doubt that Medicine, which began as a male institution that sought to bar women, would allow their kind to be sidelined. A focus on women's health care is well-deserved, I say, and it certainly is not be done to comprise men's health care.
I look forward to reviewing your ranking of the top Men's Hospitals in Canada in the near future ? Shall I hold my breath ?
I find it perplexing that medical hospitals as big as these need to develop plans to service one half of the population. Why not better services for all. The only care that is different for woman in medical practice are gynaecology and Obstetrics primarily. The focus should be on wait times. What I fear about this practice of using as the author of this well articulated article puts it a "gender lens" is there will be no such gender lens for men. I watch the nightly health section on my local news station and nine out of ten times they are discussing children's or woman's health issues. As practitioners we need to get back to basics and only find divisions in care in two scenarios: 1) when they truly benefit all patients 2) when one half is truly being misrepresented in care. This is not the case. What is happening in woman's services are fast and steadily outpacing male services to the point where men are becoming second class patients. Divisions in care have and always will exist I just believe it is time men get some focus under this "gender lens". More importantly then all of this is the need to get health care access to the most vulnerable THE POOR! A good note for male patients in their increased self advocacy which has traditionally been lacking. I was so pleased to see all the great funding done over movember for mens greatest threat outside of heart disease, prostate cancer. Merry Christmas all.